Archived Content

Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards and has not been altered or updated since it was archived. Please contact us to request a format other than those available.

Language use in the workplace in Canada

Box 1: National Household Survey

This is the second release of data from the National Household Survey (NHS). Roughly 4.5 million households across Canada were selected for the NHS, representing about one-third of all households.

This NHS in Brief article, together with the article Commuting to work, Catalogue no. 99-012-X2011003, complements the analytical document Portrait of Canada's Labour Force, Catalogue no. 99-012-X2011002.

Further information on the National Household Survey can be found in the National Household Survey User Guide, Catalogue no. 99-001-X. Specific information on the quality and comparability of NHS data on language of work can be found in the Languages Reference Guide, National Household Survey, Catalogue no. 99-010-X2011007.

Close to 99% of workers in Canada report using English or French at work

Based on new data from the 2011 National Household Survey (NHS), 98.7% of workers in Canada reported using English or French at work either most often or on a regular basis (Table 1.a).

More specifically, English was used at work by 84.7% of the population, of which 76.9% used it most often, 1.7% used it equally with French, and 6.1% used it on a regular basis as a second language. In the case of French, 25.3% of the population reported using it at work, of which 20.1% used it most often, 1.7% equally with English, and 3.5% on a regular basis as a second language.

The situation was similar at the time of the 2006 Census of Population, with 85.0% of the population having reported using English at work and 25.7% reported using French (Table 1.b).

In Quebec, in 2011, 93.9% of the population reported using French (81.7% most often, 6.6% on a regular basis and 5.5% equally with English). As for English, 39.2% reported using it at work, including 12.0% most often, 21.7% on a regular basis and 5.5% equally with French.

At the time of the 2006 Census, French was reported as the language of work by 94.3% of Quebec workers. Compared with 2006, Quebec workers were somewhat less likely to report using French or English most often at work in 2011 and more likely to report speaking these two languages equally at work.

In all provinces outside Quebec, English largely dominates as the language of work, with 98.4% of the population reporting using it in 2011. French is used at work by 4.6% of the population, including 1.5% most often, 2.5% on a regular basis and 0.6% equally with English. This proportion is similar to that of persons who reported using a language other than English or French at work, namely 4.7% of the population, 1.5% of which use it most often, 2.6% on a regular basis and 0.6% equally with an official language. These are practically the same proportions as at the time of the 2006 Census.

Of all of the languages other than English or French used at work, the family of Chinese languages ranked first in 2011. The number of responses mentioning the useFootnote 1 of a Chinese language most often or on a regular basis at work was approximately 224,000, or 27.8% of the nearly 807,760 references to a non-official language.Footnote 2

Close to 14% of Canadian workers report using at least two languages at work

In 2011, 2.65 million people (13.9%) reported using more than one language at work. At the time of the 2006 Census, 2.76 million people (15%) reported doing so.

Of all census metropolitan areas (CMAs) in the country, the Quebec part of the Ottawa - Gatineau CMA has the largest proportion of workers reporting using at least two languages at work (58.4%). It is followed by the CMAs of Montréal (47.5%), Moncton (36.7%), Sherbrooke (28.7%), Ottawa - Gatineau (Ontario part) [27.9%] and Greater Sudbury (23.2%). In these CMAs, the two languages are predominantly English and French.Footnote 3

Official language use in the main contact regions between the language groups

The CMAs where the highest proportions of use of at least two languages at work are observed are located in regions of frequent contact between the various language groups, generally in Quebec and in regions of Ontario and New Brunswick close to the Quebec border.

Use of English and French at work varies substantially within these CMAs both as languages used most often and on a regular basis, and as the main language (Table 2.a).

In 2011, French was the main language of work of 71.8% of workers in the Montréal CMA. If use of French equally with English (8.6%) and use of French on a regular basis as a second language (10.1%) are included, French is used at work by 90.5% of the population of this CMA.

At the time of the 2006 Census, 91.2% of the Montréal population reported using French at work (Table 2.b). However, compared with the 2006 Census, workers were less likely in the 2011 NHS to report using English or French most often and slightly more likely to report using these two languages equally.

On Montréal Island, where most workers for whom English is the first official language spoken are located, French is used less often. In 2011, French was used most often by 59.5% of workers. Another 10.7% of the population reported using that language equally with English and 14.5% reported using it on a regular basis.Footnote 4 At the time of the 2006 Census, workers were less likely to report using English and French equally (8.7%).

In the Ottawa - Gatineau CMA, French was used most often at work by 19.9% of workers in 2011, while 5.1% reported using it equally with English and another 18.3% used it on a regular basis. These proportions vary substantially depending on whether the workers live on the Quebec or Ontario side, with French being used much more by workers from the Quebec Outaouais.

In the four CMAs, workers were slightly more likely to report using English and French equally in their work in 2011 than they were at the time of the 2006 Census.

Additional information

Additional information on language of work can be found in the NHS Data Tables, Catalogue nos. 99-012-X2011026 through 99-012-X2011029, the NHS Profile, Catalogue no. 99-010-X, as well as in the NHS Focus on Geography Series, Catalogue no. 99-010-X2011005.

For details on the concepts, definitions, universes, variables and geographic terms used in the 2011 National Household Survey, please consult the National Household Survey Dictionary, Catalogue no. 99-000-X. For detailed explanations on concepts and for information on data quality, please refer to the reference guides on the Census Program website.

Note to readers

Random rounding and percentage distributions: To ensure the confidentiality of responses collected for the 2011 National Household Survey while maintaining the quality of the results, a random rounding process is used to alter the values reported in individual cells. As a result, when these data are summed or grouped, the total value may not match the sum of the individual values, since the total and subtotals are independently rounded. Similarly, percentage distributions, which are calculated on rounded data, may not necessarily add up to 100%.

Due to random rounding, estimates and percentages may vary slightly between different 2011 National Household Survey products, such as the analytical documents and various data tables.

Comparability between estimates from the 2006 Census long form and the 2011 National Household Survey estimates: When comparing estimates from the 2006 Census long form and estimates from the 2011 National Household Survey (NHS) users should take into account the fact that the two sources represent different populations. The target population for the 2006 Census long form includes usual residents in collective dwellings and persons living abroad whereas the target population for the NHS excludes them. Moreover, the NHS estimates are derived from a voluntary survey and are therefore subject to potentially higher non-response error than those derived from the 2006 Census long form.

Acknowledgments

This report was prepared by Jean-Pierre Corbeil, of Statistics Canada's Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division, with the assistance of staff members of Statistics Canada's Census Subject Matter Secretariat, Social and Aboriginal Statistics Division, Geography Division, Census Operations Division, Dissemination Division and Communications Division.

Date modified: